“When a school, sports organisation, or club bans trans children from participating in the activities they love, it is not about safety, and it is certainly not about “simple biology” as biology is anything but simple. These bans are not motivated by concern for anyone’s wellbeing. They are political choices. They function like other historic systems of exclusion: mechanisms designed to separate, stigmatise, and deny a group of children access to the social life their peers take for granted. They send trans children one message: you do not belong here.
The Girlguiding announcement this week was not grounded in research, evidence, or risk assessments. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, showing that young trans girls pose a threat to anyone. You don’t need specialist training to see the statement for what it was: a decision shaped by political pressure, not safeguarding needs.
We should have no illusions about the stakes here. These escalating bans do not emerge from public demand, nor from data. They grow out of networks of influence, money, and ideology. They target trans people first, but their implications reach far wider.